Talk:Hybrid operating room
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hybrid operating room article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hybrid operating room. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S2eZdaCK5rY
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110218192836/http://rpop.iaea.org/rpop/rpop/content/informationfor/healthprofessionals/1_radiology/fluoroscopy.htm to https://rpop.iaea.org/rpop/rpop/content/informationfor/healthprofessionals/1_radiology/fluoroscopy.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
This article has serious problems
[edit]"As in other minimally invasive surgery, not everybody in the surgical community did not believe in this technology. Today it is the gold standard for many types of surgery." The article is riddled with passages like this, which are both badly written, unsupported, and not neutral. Esouder (talk) 06:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)