Talk:Hybrid array

Title

I've clear the proprietary marketing-speak spam from this article, but I'm not sure that the industry has stabilized on a term for this concept. "Hybrid array" doesn't turn up than many relevant ghits. SSD caching or flash cache might be less ambiguous. Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last section title

"Further reading" is quite an appropriate section title per WP:FURTHER "a reasonable number of editor-recommended publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject". The sole article linked for now summarizes the hybrid array enterprise market as of September 2013. Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:46, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will add that my rule of thumb as to whether something belong in "external links" versus "further reading" is whether you'd be able to get a DOI for it. Articles which have been published and don't normally change thereafter qualify par excellence, even though DOIs have seen little traction outside academia. (In contrast, the landing/main page of a website [like Wikipedia's main page] doesn't normally qualify for a DOI.) Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In a few words, "Further reading" is pretty much about recommended books and similar publications (more like a "Bibliography"), while "External links" is supposed to contain links to relevant web sites providing more details. — Dsimic (talk) 20:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]