Jump to content

Talk:Hyannis, Massachusetts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

what is the difference between Hyannis and Hyannisport, Massachusettes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.18.136.13 (talk) 02:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.135.105 (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boston

[edit]

did'nt the band members of boston dance through the streets of Hyannis? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.68.135.105 (talk) 12:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyannis rail by 2010

[edit]

The MBTA does not have any plans to extend rail service to Hyannis by 2010. The state is looking at extending Middleborough/Lakeville commuter rail service to Wareham and Buzzards Bay, but not until after the New Bedford/Fall River extension is built, which will take many years to complete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.148.33 (talk) 03:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the same "Hyannis Port"

[edit]

There's currently three articles I'm looking into.

Firstly are "Hyannis Port" and description inside the 'Hyannis Port District' articles referring to the same place??? If so, would it not make more sense to redirect the "Hyannis Port" article redirect to the above article about the Hyannis Port historic district? Secondly is the Historic district the same spot as where the Hy-Line Cruises departs from? CaribDigita (talk) 07:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iyannough Statue.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Iyannough Statue.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reverting drinking water section

[edit]

Magnolia677 reverted because "if this is "not unique to Hyannis", then it's not worth noting, per WP:NOTNEWS" ?

I dont agree. I am pretty sure the citizens of Hyannis dont think so, because of a decade or 2 if you like, long history of water issues.:

Many issues are newsworthy, even though they occur in different locations around a state or the country a continent or the world. Your argument not unique to Hyannis, then it's not worth noting doesnt hold water.

i also conclude that you are not informed about, and appear to not live in Barnstable County.--Wuerzele (talk) 03:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

now John from Idegon reverted the benign addition of sourced content into an article that has barely ANY sourced content calling it "clearly edit warring" ?
How to explain that ?--Wuerzele (talk) 03:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If you have bothered to read the link you were provided, NOTNEWS requires sustained widespread coverage. You have 0 sources from outside the local area. Information that is strictly of interest to the local area is not encyclopedic. You are editing against consensus. When you make a new addition and another editor reverts your addition with a reason, you are required to come to the talk page and form a consensus before re-adding it. To not do so is the definition of edit warring. When two editors disagree with your edit, it is quite egregious edit warring. As to your statement about your county, no I have never been there and do not need to have any first hand knowledge of your area to edit this article. Your attitude is approaching WP:OWN. If you can demonstrate thru sources that this information has sustained and widespread coverage, a consensus can probably be formed. Please just lose the attitude, ok? And stop edit warring. As far as the current state of the article, you are absolutely correct. It sucks. Adding more local interest stuff is not improving it. Reference some of what's there. That would be an improvement. John from Idegon (talk) 04:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First, there is no rule that only national media qualify as WP:RS.
second lets deal with the facts of teh article.
"If you had bothered to read the 9 links you were provided" (oh what a bureaucratic passive sentence construction!), you wouldnt have written the above, nor use such angry language ( bother, egregerious, etc). John from Idegon appears to want to suppress the benign addition of sourced content.
re accusations: I think jfi is WP:wikilawyering when accusing me of ownership of the site, making one addition to an article.
I think it is obvious that jfi edit warred reverting me twice without talking. I reverted magnolia once who didnt talk and Jfi once who also didnt talk until I started a post. I would ask you to ping me if you adress me jfi, --Wuerzele (talk) 20:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Kearsarge03216 (talk) 18:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Some time has passed since this has been updated. The first Cape Cod Times that I just read in a search was the 2022 construction of a new fire fighting training facility that does not use foam. If/when I get a bit more time and energy, I'd like to get into improving this article. It appears the fight is over and this wiki should reflect that. [1][reply]

References

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hyannis, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hyannis, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]