Talk:Huw Edwards (conductor)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 04:11, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to give you an update to make sure you know that I have not forgotten about this article. I suddenly got much more busy than I had expected to be. I've only reviewed the first few sections, and so far, things look good. I will try to finish my review of this article by tomorrow night or the following morning. Thank you for your patience! --Tea with toast (話) 04:30, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! --Another Believer _(Talk) 05:38, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Well done.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
While not necessary for GA, it would be nice to have an image. I am glad you have the info and quote boxes as that helps to add some visual dimension. If you can't find a free image of the man himself, perhaps you might find an image of an auditorium he has performed in? Just a suggestion.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
It has been a pleasure to review such a well written article! Thank you for your effort in researching it and writing it. --Tea with toast (話) 04:11, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for taking the time to offer a review. I appreciate the image suggestion as well. --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.