Talk:Hurt (Christina Aguilera song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: HĐ (talk · contribs) 15:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Lead
[edit]- It was written by Aguilera, Linda Perry and Mark Ronson for Aguilera's fifth studio album, Back to Basics (2006). --> add the producer
- Done
- which was planned to be the second single --> the second one
- Done
- "Hurt" received positive reviews from music critics who praised Aguilera's voice and its production ---> add a comma after critics
- Done
- Commercially, it was a worldwide success, peaking within the top ten in Australia, Austria, Belgium and France... ---> Commercially, the single attained moderate success in the US, peaking at number... However, it was a top-ten hit worldwide, peaking...
- Done
- in several occasions, including a performance at the 2006 MTV Video Music Awards and on her 2006-07 Back to Basics Tour. --> on several occasions, including at the 2006 MTV VMA ...
- Done
Still reviewing — HĐ (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Background
[edit]- However, record company RCA Records felt that with the holiday season coming up, it would be safer to release "Hurt", as it would become a big holiday power ballad, comparable to how Aguilera's "Beautiful" performed commercially back in the 2002 holidays. ---> However, the singer's recording label RCA Records felt that with the holiday season coming up, it would be safer to release "Hurt", as it would become a big holiday power ballad, comparable to how Aguilera's "Beautiful" performed commercially back in the 2002 holidays.
- Done
Composition
[edit]- Its slow melody is paced at 72 beats per minute and set in common time ---> ?
- Done
- Aguilera's voice range spans from G3 to E5 ---> I think "vocals" would be more suitable than "voice"
- Done
- Eric Gorfain., ---> remove the full stop
- Done
- The lyrics part is so... lame? (sorry, I don't have any words to describe it) Why are the lyrics sourced by the album notes? You should source them by MetroLyrics or something else?
- Done
Critical reception
[edit]- well received ---> well-received
- Done
- I don't think the quotebox is required here. Remove it
- Done
Chart performance
[edit]- Add RIAA certification
- Done
- has sold over 1.1 million digital copies so far ---> I don't think "so far" is needed
- Done
- a Gold certification 40,000 digital downloads ---> a Gold certification for 40,000 digital downloads
- Done
- and has spent ---> had spent
- Done
- year-end chart in 2006, Hurt peaked at number 150 ---> of 2006,... was the 150th best-selling single in the country
- Done
- has re-entered ---> remove "has"
- Done
- In Australia, "Hurt" entered the charts ---> chart
- Done
- The next week ---> The following week
- Done
- falling out ---> and fell out
- Done
- spending a total of 27 weeks in the chart ---> on the chart
- Done
- Belgium and France certifications are based on SALES, not SHIPMENTS, fix it
- Done
- Add the chart position for Swiss chart
- Done
- Swiss certification is based on unspecified figures, not shipments, fix it
- Done
Music video
[edit]- due to coldness ---> due to the coldness
- Done
- the ending instrumental to "Enter the Circus"/"Welcome" ---> of
- Done
- old fashioned ---> old-fashioned
- Done
Live and covers
[edit]- in her Back to Basics Tour ---> on
- Done
Credits
[edit]- Use n-dash instead of dash
- Done
Release history
[edit]- Add label
- Done
Charts
[edit]- Add !scope="row" for charts information
- Done
- Sources for charts need accessdate
- Done
Sources
[edit]- Several sources (example: MTV News, Rolling Stone, Billboard...) require brackets in their publisher. (Use {{Cite news}} instead of {{Cite web}})
- Done
- Reviewing
Status
[edit]- On hold — HĐ (talk) 03:40, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
— HĐ (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done all. Jorn talk 15:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Second read through
[edit]Lead
[edit]- It was written by Aguilera, Linda Perry and Mark Ronson, and produced by Perry for Aguilera's fifth studio album, Back to Basics (2006). ---> repetition of "Aguilera", try "her", "the latter" or "the singer"
- It was released as the album's second single on September 19, 2006 by RCA Records instead of "Candyman", which was planned to be the second one. ---> repetition of "it", try "the song" or "the track"
- Perry developed the first draft of the song while Aguilera rewrote some of the lyrics, and the final version is a tribute to the pair's symbiotic teamwork ---> this is sourced by About.com, which is NOT so reliable
- Aguilera's voice ---> vocals
- attained a moderate success ---> success is countable lol?
- however, it was certified gold by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), having sold more than 1.1 million copies in the country alone, according to Nielsen SoundScan. ---> don't require "however"
- directed by Floria Sigismondi and Aguilera herself in September 2006. ---> I think Aguilera is just a co-director here
- It was well-received, ---> reduce the comma
Background
[edit]- On the second disc and her work with Perry on it, Aguilera stated ---> about, not on
- originated of ---> ?
Sources
[edit]Several sources which have problems:
- FN4: About.com doesn't require brackets in its publisher
- FN5: What is Mansized? Try to find sources are reliable, like I did on "Candyman (Christina Aguilera song)"
- FN9: MetroLyrics requires publisher
- FN18: CBS News requires publisher
- FN21: IGN requires publisher
- FN25: cite news
- FN55: work?
- FN56: publisher?
- Sources for charts in "Chart performance" and "Charts" must be as the same.
- Sources for "Amazon.com" needs publisher as "Amazon Inc"
— HĐ (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Status
[edit]- Failing, as too many mistakes. Sorry but the article is not ready for GA yet. — HĐ (talk) 02:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.