Jump to content

Talk:Hurricane Olivia (1975)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article shortly, just getting things set up first. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:11, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Second and third sentences of the lead start with "It..."
  • Last two sentences of the lead start with "The hurricane..."
    • I think I fixed the above two, but I fixed it assuming the complaint was two sentences in a row beginning with the same word(s). If this wasn't right, feel free to revert me. Ks0stm (TCG) 18:00, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Link circulation to Low-pressure area (I'm assuming)
  • "The circulation became much better defined the next day, and on October 23 Olivia turned northeastward, attaining hurricane status that evening." - Redundancy/time confusion. You state the next day (following October 22) then state on October 23. To me, that reads as if there is a day between the two.
  • "Further intensification occurred, and around 0500 UTC on October 25 Olivia made landfall on Mazatlán, Sinaloa with peak winds of 115 mph (185 km/h), with gusts to 140 miles per hour (230 km/h)..." - with peak winds...with gusts. Slight repetition, better to reword it.
  • "As Olivia moved ashore, it produced locally heavy rainfall peaking at 7.28 in (185 mm) in Pueblo Nuevo, Durango." comma after rainfall
  • "...although precipitation of around 1 in (25 mm) reached as far south as Michoacán." - How far is this from where the center was?
  • "Olivia is one of only three major hurricanes on record to strike Mazatlan, the others being the 1943 hurricane, as well as another in 1957; in addition Hurricane Tico in 1983 came close." - close to what?
  • In the first sentence of the last paragraph, Mazatlán is missing the á.
  • Last paragraph seems out of order; "Three days after...Immediately...The day after

Aside from these issues, the article is good. I'll pass it once they've been addressed. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]