Talk:Hurricane Joan–Miriam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Cleaned up the issues concerning missing convert templates, missing nbsps, changes to date wikilinks per MOS update, and a few verbage issues. The lead was also expanded. Hopefully it will be able to pass this time as the stubbiness in the impact section no longer appears to be much of a problem. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article currently up for Good Article nomination again. I'll have the full review up in a couple of hours. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

1. Well Written

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "Moving on a nearly due west course for nearly two weeks in October..." - Is it possible to have the word "nearly" used only once in this sentence? It's the second sentence in the lead.

2. Factually Accurate

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Can you add the authors to the references? Especially since only a few of them do.

3. Neutral point of view.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. Stability

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Great job overall, only one little thing in the lead that can be quickly fixed. The references should have their authors though, and all but a few don't, so I am putting the article on hold to allow you time to deal with these issues. If you have any questions, just leave a note here or on my talk page. :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:38, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The tasks have been completed. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Great, I'm passing (well, passed) the article :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)