Talk:Hurricane Carlotta (2006)

Hurricane Carlotta (2006) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 18, 2008	Good article nominee	Not listed
December 1, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
June 29, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
April 16, 2013	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Carlotta (2006)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Looks good, as always. I've made a couple minor tweaks, but I couldn't find any significant problems. Good work. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 20:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

Should this article be merged? Y E ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:13, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unless more impact can be found (which is dubious - I remember when working on this FT that there wasn't much info), I don't think it should exist. It is a run-of-the-mill tropical cyclone. A long (bloated) MH doesn't make it important. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hurricane Carlotta (2006)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Expand SH, and overall copyedit. For example, I shouldn't be able to find words like "dumped". –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above still applies. For the impact section, look for flooding information. The Met. history still needs more info, as well. Why did the storm move the way it did? –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 15:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:45, 26 June 2016 (UTC)