Talk:Hunting Trip/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
This is a very good article. I am confused by one issue, however, the inclusion in the Reception section of 'and called Ron's orgasmic reaction to Andy's shoeshine a "detour into an inspired absurdity that tugs against and tweaks the show's bureaucratic backdrop".' I thought that was another episode. It is not mentioned in this one previously. Xtzou (Talk) 21:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- Whoops! You're 100% right, I had teh wrong reference in there. Sort of an embarrassing error, but it is now fixed. Thanks for the review! — Hunter Kahn 21:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
- Pass or Fail: Pass!
Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 22:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)