Talk:Hungry Bay Nature Reserve

Hungry Bay Nature Reserve has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: November 14, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Hungry Bay Nature Reserve appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Hungry Bay Nature Reserve is the most northerly mangrove swamp in the Atlantic Ocean?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hungry Bay Nature Reserve.

Wikipedia

Caribbean: Bermuda Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Bermuda (assessed as Mid-importance).

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hungry Bay Nature Reserve/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 09:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to undertake this review. On a preliminary view, the article is quite short but seems to cover the main aspects of the subject.

The lead is supposed to be a summary of the rest of the article, and should not contain anything that is not included elsewhere. In this case, the lead mentions two endangered crabs which are not further mentioned.
- They both are, in the Fauna section. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It also mentions information on Ramsar sites which is not elsewhere. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the reason mentioned above, it should not be necessary to have citations in the lead, because the relevant facts should have their references in the main body of the text.
- Ok. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the references are bare urls. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- All clear. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"The reserve can be reached by motorway," - This seems a bit misleading as one source states "Public access to the site is limited and only possible through private lands. Public access will not be encouraged."

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Fixed.QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have put this review on hold. If within one week action is taken on the issues mentioned above, I will review the article further, otherwise I will consider whether it currently meets the good article criteria and if it does not, it will fail. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have done a little copyediting, mostly in connection with wikilinks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We just need something about the reserve being a Ramsar site, and why it fulfils the qualifications, in the body of the article. At present it is only in the lead. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have done some copyediting and have added some information about the Ramsar site to the body of the text.
I think this article reaches the necessary GA criteria; it is well-written and laid out, it is well-referenced and contains no original research, it covers the main aspects of the topic, is neutral and is stable. It lacks images, apart from the range map, because none are available. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hungry Bay Nature Reserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110207163535/http://www.conservation.bm/ramsar-sites-photo-gallery/ramsar-sites/8479942 to http://www.conservation.bm/ramsar-sites-photo-gallery/ramsar-sites/8479942

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:03, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]