Jump to content

Talk:Hungry (The X-Files)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHungry (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHungry (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 7) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 25, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hungry (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Glimmer721 (talk · contribs) 01:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon. Glimmer721 talk 01:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • Can the black on the top and bottom of the screenshot be cropped off?
  • "Mixed-to-positive" does not need the hyphens
  • Expand the third paragraph of the lead with more found in the filming section -- such as the absence of the two main actors.
  • Brain and skull -- overlinking
  • Why isn't Steve Kiziak in the guest list? (And why isn't his character mentioned in the plot?)
  • "...because of the stars busy schedules." stars → stars'
  • "As such, the name was changed accordingly." - Best removed, it's kind of redundent.
  • "The episode aired in the United Kingdom and Ireland on Sky1 on April 2, 2000 and episode received 0.68 million viewers." Word missing here.
  • Refs 10 and 11 need published dates
  • This isn't Yahoo News; it's Yahoo Voices, which can be written by any Yahoo user and thus unreliable. (Which also explains why a lot of articles on that site are poorly written...)

Putting on hold for 7 days while issues are addressed. Glimmer721 talk 02:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I got most fixed. I'll change the picture ASAP. I replaced the Yahoo article with one from a Cinefantastique magazine.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image has been cropped!--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hungry (The X-Files). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AV Club compares the episode style to "Columbo"

[edit]

https://tv.avclub.com/the-x-files-hungry-millennium-1798175236 also other sources say Gilligan drew directly from Columbo, but I think I can find a better citation for that with more time or maybe even a quote 203.217.53.150 (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good find! This should probably be worked in to the article, probably in the Production section. I'd be interested in seeing if you can find more info.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:56, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]