Talk:Hungary/GA1

NO ACTION

The review was opened by a novice Wikipedian who clearly didn't understand what was involved in reviewing a GA nomination, and made only one post over two months ago. The nomination is being returned to the reviewing pool (relisted) with no loss of seniority; with luck, an experienced reviewer will pick this up soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jacktime34 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good and also is well written

Before you proceed, even as nominator, I'd like to notify you about the 15 dead links in the article which I intend to cleanup before the finalization of the nomination. Geo ^talk 13:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to stick my neck in, but this review has been untouched for around two months. Jacktime34 has been moderately active in that time, so it's my guess that this has been forgotten. Maybe the reviewer thought that this is just a place to leave comments. If the reviewer doesn't have the commitment to review this very long and at points controversial article (all countries are for obvious reasons), including every single one of its references, then this should be relisted. Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 22:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.