Talk:Huna people

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Huna people article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

[Untitled]

Hello All,

Although I myself enjoy reading about Vikramaditya, I should note that since the article is about the Hunas, we should concentrate on a discussion of them. I do not want to unilaterally delete the discussion of the Raghuvamsa and the Mahabharata; however, I would recommend relocating them to the Chandra Gupta II/Vikramaditya article. Perhaps we could mention their early conflict with Indian Kings, such as Vikramaditya, and reference these two works. I will wait a little while before making the change myself. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Devanampriya 16:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The name

The name of this article is currently Hunas. This includes an English plural 's' at the end. It ought to be renamed to the historic term, Huna for clarity. Imc 10:12, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

hi i would like to bring to your notice article about Huna people in which i suspect vandalism as it creates confusion with another article named White Huns also named as Hephthalite Empire, people are directly copying and pasting content from white huns to huna people article you can see this is 3 sections Origin, Yuezhi Theory, Religion one can easily find that this 3 sections are directly copied and pasted from white huns article and pasted here in huna people article but both article are different topic, white huns were people across hindu kush and huna people were people from north western india. i request admins to please look into this matter and resolve it. Sushilkumarmishra (talk) 07:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huna vs Hun

I came to point out that Huns and Hunas are distinctly different peoples. I see someone is also saying that, so am adding my voice to encourage that distinction, please. I do not have the sources yet myself to do such editing, but will keep an eye on how changes progress. 66.8.136.18 (talk) 03:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a tribune, and not a pulpit. Of course, over time, the language-languages of the subject differed from the original. But the fact that they came out of Central Asia during the Great Migration of Peoples that began from the Great Steppe from the 1st century AD. is a fundamental fact. Give authoritative sources, and do not be unfounded, you are ridiculous.--164.0.115.132 (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Titus Kacan[reply]