Talk:Humidicutis mavis

A fact from Humidicutis mavis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the white mushroom Humidicutis mavis (pictured) has been recorded from New Zealand, Australia and Borneo?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Humidicutis mavis.

Wikipedia

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fungi Low‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edibility

Apparently edible in autumn? The article doesn't seem to clearly specify if so. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 05:00, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its edibility is unknown - as is that of most species in Australasia. It's pretty tiny anyway. Where did you read that it was edible? Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:18, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I knew nothing of this mushroom until seeing a link to this article from the Wikipedia main page. Wondering if it was toxic or edible, I did a quick search, and among the first results have seen "autumn edible" in the summary. After your answer I decided to actually search again and click on the link, to discover that it was actually "Edible: no" followed by "Autumn" on the next line. In the following link ([1]), it's not considered edible, afterall. Sorry for the confusion. If its edibility or toxicity are actually unknown, it makes sense for the article to not specify it, although perhaps that it's worth mentioning for non-mycologists like me who'll also visit from the main page. Thanks, 76.10.128.192 (talk) 05:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Humidicutis mavis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130210093811/http://hiddenforest.co.nz/fungi/family/tricholomataceae/humid01.htm to http://hiddenforest.co.nz/fungi/family/tricholomataceae/humid01.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]