Talk:Humfrey Gale/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

3A Is there any way of finding out what the MC was awarded for ?--Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

• Not that I know of. The London Gazette records only the award. I checked the WO medal card but it contains no further information. His full personnel file is unavailable, as he served in WWII. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:05, 11 September 2010 (UTC)