Jump to content

Talk:Human rights in Serbia/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Neutrality of the article

Naturally, I do not wish to diminish the atrocities already described in the article, but point out that the topic needs to be evaluated from a neutral point of view. Certainly, the Serbs are not the only ones who experience breaches of human rights in Serbia, and there are many -neutral- sources where these can be found. I'll name just a few:

Rosier (talk) 16:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

A section of human rights violations in Serbia during the Balkan wars needs to be in this article. --(GriffinSB) (talk) 13:55, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


What the hell is this? From the beginning this article was a battlefield of Serbian, Albanian,Romanian and Croatian nationalist. Could someone add something about the actual human right in Serbia rather than spamming ridiculous nationalistic propaganda?

I don`t understand what do you mean by this comment? Majority of info present in the article has valid refs about the state/rights of particular ethnic group in Serbia and Vojvodina.Adrian (talk) 13:50, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism?

I've reverted a potential vandalism: no one can delete a sourced paragraph (i'm referring to the deletion of the "Vojodina" paragraph) nor change the sense of a sourced passage going against its sources (i'm referring to the "Kosovo" paragraph) without giving an explanation. More than 3/4 of the article was deleted. If you wish to greatly change it please talk about it here. --AndreaFox2 (talk) 14:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Human rights in Serbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:42, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

About including the section about the Bosnian war

"During the breakup of Yugoslavia Serbia was the perpetrator of several human rights violations, most recognizably in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Many who participated in Serb forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina were brought up on crimes against humanity and eventually indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia."

Why would you include this paragraph? The Wikipedia article is about Human rights in Serbia - I do not see what Bosnia has to do with the Republic of Serbia. Othmas biaggio (talk) 20:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)