Talk:Human Dimension

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Blow it up and start over

This article has had the 'essay' cleanup tag since 2014. The page is large enough that it would likely be a difficult task to rewrite the entire thing, although if someone feels up to it, I don't wish to discourage that. However, in the absence of any volunteers to fix the page I think we might just want to blow it up and start over. Essentially my proposal here is that the page's text be removed entirely and replaced with a stub which gives a basic explanation of what this is, which would hopefully be expanded in future (if necessary) into a proper article. I'm not suggesting that the page itself be removed entirely and recreated, because I want people to be able to go back in the page's history in case someone does want to try to fix it. If that happens, they can integrate their fixed version into the stub version of the article. Should there be some sort of discussion on this somewhere more high-profile? I don't really know where to go for that. Any advice is appreciated.

Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DesertPipeline I agree Deskjobo (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. At least a humongous trim down, possibly deletion. The only ok looking reference is a dead link:-( Commander Keane (talk) 00:28, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]