Talk:Hum Sab Ka Pakistan

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2012. The result of the discussion was delete and redirect.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles

Pakistan

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles

Albums

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

contested deletion

As told before, GNews and Gbooks are almost useless regarding to non-Western subjects. Every subject deserves a fair change based on useful research. Night of the Big Wind _talk 03:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of tags, without proper reason

Night removed two "unreliable sources" tags from this article without proper reason. I've restored them.

As was discussed with Night and other editors at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hum Sab Ka Pakistan, two other editors (in addition to me) do not believe these are RSs.

I would politely ask/warn Night not to remove those appropriate tags again, without this issue having been resolved to indicate that our view is incorrect.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop baiting me? Thanks. Night of the Big Wind _talk 16:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no desire to bait you. This is an article that I PRODed. You then appeared at it. Perhaps following me, as you have indicated your are doing. To de-PROD my PROD.

The article was then AFD'd, and you confronted that second request that it be deleted, and added 2 sources to the article that 3 of us indicated are not RSs. To clarify that it was questionable that the added cites were RSs, I tagged the refs in accordance with the questions raised by 3 editors. You then deleted the appropriate tags, without any appropriate reason.

You then, for reasons I cannot fathom, asked whether I was following you around. By the edit history of the article, clearly the opposite is the case here (as elsewhere). I first PRODed the article. You then removed the PROD, with your first edit to the article.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]