Talk:Huguenot-Walloon half dollar/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 15:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

I see you have three other coin articles up for GA. If they're all as fine as this one they shouldn't be queueing for long. Other editors will have to look at them: one can't review one's friends' articles wholesale (I itch to review some more of Gerda's Bach cantata GANs but sternly forbear) though I think it's within the bounds of propriety for me to do a single one.

Just to make the present review look positively nepotic, I can't find anything to quibble at in the article, apart from a handful of duplicate links which may or may not be intentional (and are not especially bothersome either way). They are Peter Minuit, Admiral Gaspard de Coligny, William the Silent and Prince of Orange. The images could do with Alt text for screen readers etc, though that isn't a criterion for GA.

That being so:

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Shall we be seeing this at FAC? Ping me, if and when, please. Tim riley talk 15:47, 2 October 2015 (UTC)