Talk:Hugo Byttebier

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the discussion was Merge 'Eichmann' content into David Irving, with minimal biog material. Non-admin close. Pincrete (talk) 15:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Hugo Byttebier be merged into David Irving. I think that the content in the Byttebier article can easily be integrated into the Irving article. As the article quite rightly says he was a footnote. As such he fails WP:ANYBIO and meets WP:BIO1E. There are no other sources. Domdeparis (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- with redirect. No justification for separate article. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 17:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ditto This footnote warrants a footnote in the target article. Kleuske (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Byttebier; I don't even see why a redirect is needed for such a minor nothingness. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:08, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The only claim to notability hinges on his relation to Irving; thus, his surrender of the Eichmann documents should be merged and the rest should be just removed. CityOfSilver 22:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support redirecting to a footnote. I would have said "Delete" per jpgordon, but the page has several incoming links which would be disrupted if we simply delete. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Is this enough for a Snow closure? Xyl 54 (talk) 23:24, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Minimal marge and redirect - The guy's only notability is in regards to giving Irving the Eichmann manuscript, and he certainly doesn't need an article for that -- even a stub -- so he can be incorporated as a mention in the Irving article (if he's not there already), with a minimal footnote about his background if necessary. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.