Talk:Hugh the Chanter

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hugh the Chanter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is apparently a real person. See this search. -- Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 18:35, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Why, if the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography lists him as Hugh the Chanter, and practically every book I have on my shelves lists him the same way, is he under Hugh Sottovagina? Surely there is a reason. Ealdgyth | Talk 01:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose someone thought that was a funnier name.--Bedivere (talk) 13:25, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OED - "Hugh the Chanter [Hugh the Chantor, Hugh Sottovagina] (d. c.1140), historian, may have had family origins in Flanders or Picardy, a suggestion supported by the other name by which he was known, Sottovagina (Sottewain in the vernacular), evidently a nickname meaning ‘foolish (or absurd) scabbard’. It was an unusual name, which Hugh shared with a number of individuals associated with York. Thomas Sottovagina and his brother Ernulf, for instance, both York canons, occurring from the 1120s to the 1150s, may have been Hugh's nephews or sons." Parrot of Doom (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]