Talk:Hugh John Casey
Hugh John Casey has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright Violation?
[edit]It sure seems to me that this page largely cribs from here: http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/hjcasey.htm and it even uses the same photograph. However, it is possible that both pages are derived from the Army-published memoirs of Gen. Casey listed as a reference for this article: Engineer Memoirs: Major General Hugh J. Casey, Office of History, US Army Corps of Engineers, 1993.
What strikes me is that both pages repeat the at least hyped story of General Casey's involvement in the design of the Pentagon when this page: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5438635 provides a much more in-depth discussion of the design and construction of the Pentagon which does not even mention General Casey. And in fact, the original design of the Pentagon was a rectangle with one corner cut off due to the constraints of the originally proposed site at Arlington Farms. The two stories can't be reconciled without further research. Did General Casey originate the rectangle with one corner cut off? Or did he take that design and regularize it into a true pentagon after President Roosevelt ordered the building to be moved south? It would seem that to legitimately include this story, you have to put it into contect one way or the other, and it is not clear from the above web pages exactly what happened. But given that Gen. Casey was (at that time) assigned to "standardize designs," I would suspect that he took the original design and regularized it into a true pentagon shape, which would make the story more meaningful if this can be verified. Perhaps somebody has access to the cited book? (I do not.)
But the story does appear to be clarified a bit here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/23/AR2007052301296_pf.html which is an excerpt from the book The Pentagon: A History, to be published by Random House. ©2007 by Stephen F. Vogel. That article makes it appear that Gen. Casey (then a Lt. Col.) picked the original Arlington Farms site that led to the five-sided design by architect George Edwin Bergstrom and his team.
ElbonianFL (talk) 14:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]Major General Casey "prepared a voluminous report on flood control for the Pittsburgh District?" This seems more like biography than encyclopedia. In terms of notability, if he isn't mentioned on The Pentagon page, why does he deserve a standalone article? 222.109.146.109 (talk) 13:13, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- General officers are generally considered notable. Casey is especially notable for his role in the design of the Pentagon, and as General of the Army Douglas MacArthur's chief engineer during the Battle of Bataan, in the jungles and mountains of New Guinea and the Philippines, and during the occupation of Japan. Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- A-Class biography articles
- A-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- A-Class military history articles
- A-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- A-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- A-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review