Talk:Hugh Evans (humanitarian)

This article was nominated for deletion on September 17, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 September 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Hugh Evans (humanitarian) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

(Comment)

Shame on you people for claiming the article was biased!! i really don't think there's a whole lot of negatives we can put on a page about someone who runs his own charity and was elected young Australian of the year!!! Seriously......

Awards

I removed the 'awards' section, I don't see how this can be biased anymore? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by LittleMissDisaster (talk • contribs) 01:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Awards restored and given substance. Rangasyd (talk) 09:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COI - ConcernedVancouverite

The article's aim is to "produce a neutral, reliably sourced encyclopedia".

There are 4 references, but only 1 reference stands true: 1 reference is from the GPP site which he founded so that doesn't count. 1 reference is from his mate, Moss, S et al. (2008) 'Oaktree Overview' who also worked in the company. So 1 reference is notable after a 9 paragraph article.

I note that Ausstory2000 and 131.111.196.202 are the 'main' editors of this article as well and their accounts have gone as well.

So that is why, ConcernedVancouverite, you night be mistaken in removing the COI tag. Please re-instate the COI tag. Thanks. Domenico.y (talk) Domenico.y —Preceding undated comment added 18:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I removed much of the content in question per WP:SOURCE, WP:BLP, and WP:N. I also removed some other content out of sheer irrelevance. The issue is rather moot unless you intend to restore the text. FYI, there's no indication any content had been written by the subject (Hugh Evans), or anyone particularly close to him, or by a member of one of his organizations. It seems reasonably likely Ausstory2000 is an Australian, but what else can you tell? Even if the editor and IP you mention are the same individual (a bad editing practice), they would have to be the subject or associated in some way to have a WP:COI. So while there are/were serious sourcing and notability issues, it's not a conflict of interest. JFHJr (㊟) 23:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JFHJr has described it well to you here as to why it is not a conflict of interest. As you will note, JFHJr's explanation is similar to the one you received on your talk page as well to a similar question [1]. I hope you understand the conflict of interest guidelines now that the question has been answered for you in multiple locations. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 04:22, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Citing and referencing

Hi CarrRenee,

You appear to have contributed to Global Poverty Project, Hugh Evans (humanitarian) and Simon McKeon. It is practice to cite and reference every single piece of information in Wikipedia with third party sources that are verifiable. Encyclopedic content must be verifiable and cited correctly. Please cite and reference your work.

Thank you.

Domenico.y (talk) 13:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC) Domenico.y[reply]

I have placed a message on this topic regarding reliable sourcing directly onto CarrRenee's userpage, where the user is most likely to see it. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hugh Evans (humanitarian). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140408224703/http://www.woodstock.ac.in/uploaded/About/images/Publications/Quad2011_updated.pdf to http://www.woodstock.ac.in/uploaded/About/images/Publications/Quad2011_updated.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]