Jump to content

Talk:Hugh Boustead/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Standardize retrieval date formats
Done. Canadian Paul 01:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Did he ever marry and/or have any children?
His obituary says that he was unmarried and none of the sources mention anything about his having any children. It's possible, of course, but I don't have any reliable sources for it. Canadian Paul 01:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. Focused:
    What was his rank in WWII? Was it local or substantive?
It was local - clarified. Canadian Paul 01:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  2. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  3. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  4. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: