Talk:Hubble sequence

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hubble sequence article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A summary of this article appears in Galaxy morphological classification.

New Hubble Scheme

File:Hubble Class.jpg

Hubble Classification Scheme

I found another Hubble chart that might look more interesting on the site. -- Hurricane Devon (Talk), September 20, 2005

Well, in my highly biased (I made the old graphic) opinion: I like the idea of having images of real galaxies on the chart, but I think his schematics are not very good. I tried to convey realistic shapes and differentiate between the bulge, bar and arms using color. Anyway, the image could definitely stand some improvement, so maybe there's an even better compromise. -- Xerxes 23:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NASA Pub. EG-2000-08-003-GSFC: Hubble Fork Diagram. --Ryanrs 00:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sites should be merged. Same exact topic, and many users would benefit from consolidation of info. for research purposes.----sjenkins

Re-write and move from galaxy morphological classification

After a major re-write, the Hubble sequence was getting too long to be just a section of the main article, so I moved it back here and left a summary under galaxy morphological classification. See the discussion here. Cosmo0 15:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date

The original article gave the date of Hubble's publication of his scheme as 1925. All the references I've seen attribute it to his 1936 book "Realm of the Nebulae", so that's what I've put. If anyone knows of an earlier reference, please update it in the article. Cosmo0 13:24, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hubble sequence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121205083205/http://sings.stsci.edu/Publications/sings_poster.html to http://sings.stsci.edu/Publications/sings_poster.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram

The reference for the diagram should be James Jeans (1928), Astronomy and Cosmogony, page 332). Originally the diagram is rotated by 90 degrees. Hobbema (talk) 12:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]