Talk:Hradčany Air Base

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hradčany Air Base. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SMALLCAT

Dear Mztourist, are you aware of this guideline? We are not supposed to create categories that are very small - the rule is actually about twenty members, if I recall correctly. We should definitely avoid creating categories with only one article. That's why I removed the single article category and placed it in the higher category. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buckshot06 have you read it? It says "unless such categories are part of a large overall accepted sub-categorization scheme". I have created categories for former Soviet air bases in numerous former Soviet Republics and Warsaw Pact countries, some countries have more, some have less. There is no mention of 20 in the guideline. There are 3 in Czech Republic, not one. The categorisation is useful because it allows interested users to easily identify the former Soviet air bases in each country, rather than have to go through a list of former Soviet air bases and work out which ones are in a particular country. Mztourist (talk) 02:58, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You've found three now? That's much better than 1, for which we should place in the main category only. Now since you and I are pretty incapable of having a civil conversation left to ourselves, we should probably seek third opinions. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever Mztourist (talk) 09:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]