Talk:Howlite

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Howlite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocks and minerals Low‑importance

	Earth sciences portal Howlite is part of WikiProject Rocks and minerals, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use rocks and minerals resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Rocks and mineralsWikipedia:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsTemplate:WikiProject Rocks and mineralsRocks and minerals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crystal healing

Hello.

I added a little bit about the crystal healing properties of Howlite, and it was reverted for being unencyclopedic.

I was just wondering how it could be, considering the topic of crystal healing is not in itself inherently unencyclopedic.

Thanks.

Benjamin (talk) 02:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For such an extraordinary claim you would need a very good source. Mikenorton (talk) 10:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not claiming that Howlite has healing properties, which would be an extraordinary claim, but merely that it is believed to have healing properties, which is not an extraordinary claim. Mikenorton

Benjamin (talk) 07:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but your believed to have healing properties is pseudoscience nonsense and very poorly sourced. A commercial website and book on the lore of gemstones rather fail as references for a scientific article. Vsmith (talk) 00:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does the article necessarily have to be completely scientific, if the subject is notable outside of the field of science? Benjamin (talk) 00:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mineral articles are based on the science of mineralogy and crystallography - see the headers above. Pseudoscience cruft and mythology rather don't fit. "Notable"? Please explain how some commercial website and a mention in some crystal healing book are "notable" for a science based article. If you wish to expand the crystal healing article ... your book ref "might" be applicable - but not here. Vsmith (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]