Talk:Howard Davis (professor of architecture)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Howard Davis (professor of architecture). EdJohnston (talk) 02:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Howard Davis (architect) → Howard Davis (author and professor of architecture) – I am the subject of this article and the title is inaccurate. I am not an architect, but an author and professor of architecture. This matter has been referred to me by an individual affiliated with my state's architectural licensing board, which deems it illegal for a person to be referred to as an "architect" if he or she is not. This is therefore a legal matter in addition to being a matter of fact. 63.224.200.24 (talk) 04:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative use Howard Davis (architecture) being a prof/writer on architecture, "architecture" the field would be appropriate disambiguation. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support the alternative. (author and ... ) is way too long. Apteva (talk) 05:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alternative it is more manageable than the proposed move.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:23, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about simply "author" in the title, and "author and professor of architecture in the title"? The word "architecture" is not a job title or a description of an individual, but an entire field. I believe that the word "architecture" might still raise problems with the licensing board. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.224.200.24 (talk) 15:59, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support moving to Howard Davis (author) as the best choice. There's another professor name Howard Davis who we have an article on, so that won't work as a disambiguator, and "architecture" isn't quite right. Do note that Mr. Davis's reason for making this request is not a reason for us to move any content, but of course it's not a reason to oppose the move either. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - with all due respect this is not a legal matter, since the words in the parentheses are there to differentiate the subject from similar named articles. The proposed title could just as easily be a redirect so that anybody searching with those words would reach the article. Green Giant (talk) 02:30, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support move to Howard Davis (architectural writer). We don't usually use more than one disambiguator and this seems to sum up what this gentleman does to people that want to find the article. Howard Davis (architecture) is terrible, as he is not "an architecture". And no, it isn't a legal matter, since Mr Davis himself has not claimed to be an architect. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Necrothesp; "architectural writer" sounds better than "author and professor of". Green Giant (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support renaming and clearly two disambiguators is not ideal. Appears that his professorship is slightly more notable than his authorship and would be slightly more clear and consistent with other parenthetical disambiguators -- which will likely result in a better searchability. I welcome the nominator to clarify which he believe which he is better known for - professorship or architectural writer. It was also interesting to note that there was another Howard Davis who was actually an architect, but he is currently deceased and this article is not about him. Tiggerjay (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on rename

It seems clear that there is support to rename the article, however there doesn't seem clear consensus on what to change it to. Below are the options discussed so far:

Howard Davis (professor of architecture) is probably best. Professors are often expected to write, and authors are not necessarily expected to be professors, so this title is more inclusive; and yes, it is true that in this case, the professorship may be more significant than the authorship. This title will lead to better searchability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.202.111.2 (talk) 01:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll throw my vote to (professor of architecture). I kinda think (architecture) is better, and would be perfectly acceptable per disambiguation naming guidelines, which indicates that the word in parentheses may be "the subject or context to which the topic applies, as in Union (set theory), Inflation (economics)". But I'm not going to fight for that result since others, including the article's subject, don't like it. Theoldsparkle (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Without trying to force a premature closure, I would also agree with professor of architecture. Shall we close it in shortly (<24 hours) with this as the disambiguator unless there are objections?Tiggerjay (talk) 05:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.