Talk:Howard Bishop
This article was nominated for deletion on 22 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I found a redlink to Howard Bishop and it seemed to me that the most positive solution to this was to create a Wikipedia article for the actor. When it became apparent that he had featured as more than just a walk-on extra in some other films, it seemed to further justify such action. However, my attention is now drawn to the guidelines on notability. Which, for actors, says the following:
Entertainers... Actors, voice actors, comedians, opinion makers, models, and celebrities:
1. Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
3. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.
Now, I'm not aware of HB qualifying under items 2 or 3, but he can't be too far short of being there for criterion number 1. Which I note is somewhat subjective. How are we defining 'multiple', 'notable', and 'significant'? If the latter is 'more than just a walk-on extra' and 'multiple' is 'more than 1', then I am left with 'notable'. And since I straight away found 4 of his appearances which had been considered worthy to be documented with Wikipedia articles, I am tempted to contend that perhaps they have at least some level of 'notability'.
On the other hand, one could adopt a more puritanical approach and ban all items relating to fictional entertainment from mention in Wikipedia... and indeed, as I dig deeper for material, so I seem to find productions which seem ever shallower; however I'm not feeling overly inclined to be judgemental...Yadsalohcin (talk) 19:47, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class Hawaii articles
- Low-importance Hawaii articles
- WikiProject Hawaii articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of actors and filmmakers
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles