Talk:How the West Was Won (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema / Arizona Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Library of Congress Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Westerns: Film High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Film task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:How the west was won322.jpg

Image:How the west was won322.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wide Screen Processes: Cinerama Vs. Todd-AO

Today the most commonly used wide-screen process is Cinemascope. Vistavision by Paramount is so similar is concept that it will only be mentioned to be complete. Both are typically 2.35:1 formats that cause movies to be letterboxed on older T.V's. The 16 X 9 format revision of future T.V.'s will solve most of these transfer problems.

Early Cinerama required 3 interlocked cameras (and 3 playback projectors) to properly film and project it. After "The Bros. Grimm" and "HTWWW", Cinerama converted to a one camera process. Many other films were shot in one camera Cinerama: "2001- A Space Oddessy" being the most notable. There were only 12 U.S. theatres with true Cinerama. Processed prints had to be made for wider national release; and yes, even these prints had those anoying "seams".

Todd-AO was another wide screen process. The most notable film produced in that format was "Around the World in 80 Days". It was an extreme wide screen process without the "seaming" problem. Other 70mm formats became more popular for wide-screen films. They were cheaper.

It is unfortunate that "How the West Was Won" is a 3 camera film, and there is notable color variation in the 1999 DVD version between the 3 sections. In this DVD is a very good featurette showing the making of (and) explaining the Cinerama process.

Remastering this film will probably never happen, so enjoy it...seams and all....

It is a western that seems to have a sense of humor about it; perhaps unintentionally. The buffalo stampede is still one of the best action scenes I have ever seen in a western film.How the West Was Won-film comment —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.26.231 (talk) 00:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:How The West Was Won screenshot.png

The image Image:How The West Was Won screenshot.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of cast names

Just a request for information: Most of the cast names that were listed in the infobox have been deleted, with the explanation that "only major stars" were being left on the list. John Wayne and Henry Fonda were not "major stars?" Monkeyzpop (talk) 21:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not in this film. Wayne is only in one scene. Fonda has a larger role, but I didn't see any reason to repeat what's in the cast section. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I see. They're not major *characters*. Okay. I was thinking "these guys are among the biggest stars in the world at the time of this film, how could they not be considered major stars?" But you're right, despite their major stardom, they don't play major *characters*. Monkeyzpop (talk) 05:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're wasting your breath (and your time). Consensus indeed.--Reedmalloy (talk) 22:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on How the West Was Won (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]