Talk:How the Mind Works

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

What is this Article About?

Just curious, is this article about the book "How the Mind Works", or is it about actually how the mind works? Ikh 05:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The book by Steven Pinker. Otherwise the title would be in normal sentence casing (Wikipedia style is that titles only capitalize the first letter in the title). Also, "How the mind works" isn't a very encyclopedic title anyway. -- Schaefer 06:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks! Ikh 02:11, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fodor?

The bottom of the article mentions a critical review by Jerry Fodor, but in fact Fodor was so critical he wrote a book titled "The Mind Doesn't Work That Way", which probably ought to be mentioned if anyone ever expands this article. 68.195.124.77 03:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blank slate

i'll leave it in for now as an example of his view, but it's pretty foolish for the only quote in an article on "how the mind works" to be from "the blank slate". perhaps someone who read the actual book could spiff this article up? --dan (talk) 13:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian or American?

In the current article it claims that Pinker is an American cognitive scientist. Although he teaches in the U.S. today, he was born and raised in Montreal, and earned several degrees from McGill University. Wouldn't that make him a Canadian cognitive scientist? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peepstein (talk • contribs) 23:39, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematically provable truth

East Pole's Steven Pinker may better note that the flamingo is stiffly pinker than the bruin or the brown bear of etymological tautology, which in turn is stiffly pinker than the grizzly and any other species. This mathematically provable notion has been well known since West Pole's Eleanor Rosch's prototype theory refined around semantic categories in 1975 in accordance with Paul Grice's (1975) famous implicature or the implicit nature of meaning in mind, that is, embodied a posteriori, acquired or learned, rather than embedded a priori, innate or inborn. Innatism may be not simply false but morally fraudulent. -- KYPark (talk) 11:10, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: Etymologically, the flamingo stems from flame, while Korean bulgom ("bruin, brown bear") stems from bul ("fire") and gom ("bear"). Yet, we hesitate to answer which is stiffly fierier, the flamingo or the bruin, as we are not born a mathematical and mechanical sensor. -- KYPark (talk) 12:11, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:StevePinker.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:StevePinker.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on How the Mind Works. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060619122521/http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/books/htmw/index.html to http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/books/htmw/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]