Jump to content

Talk:Houston Metro

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infobox

[edit]

as per wiki guidlines, the infobox is for DAILY ridership numbers. its confusing and not standard for the infobox to say Daily ridership = 98,518,251 yearly. there is a reason on the saved page, after you have entered the proper number, it says DAILY RIDERSHIP! IAH777 —Preceding comment was added at 13:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

The following comment was transferred from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Houston talk page to this talk page:

This sounds like a travel brosure for the City of Houston. The Houston Metro article should mention a few of the following. A) Metro board is not an elected board! It is chocked full of appointees of the Mayor (Bill White) and City Council. They are not accountable to anybody and spend tons tax payer dollars without any regard,they know they can just increase bus / train fair or vote for a greater portion of the tax payer subsidies. B) The Metro toy train is a waste of money! Metro decided to put it down already existing bus routes which didn't add any new riders, it simply just moved already existing bus riders on to a much much more expensive mode of transportation. C) Metro decided against running the toy train somewhere where it would be most affective like to either one of Houston's big airports, nope, they choose carving up freshly redone street's and rerouting traffic to tackle a much more pressing problem of how will homeless poeple get around through downtown streets (which most people avoid because downtown Houston sucks to navigate through) which caused a real conjestion night mare. D) Houston now leads the nation in train / vehicle accidents. Yep, Along w/ carving up busy downtown streets of Houston and usually taking a traffic lane (in both directions which further increases traffic) the train now zig-zags through the streets of Houston.It cuts through intersections, back and forth over streets,under freeways and through our medical center, which ironically helps since again we lead the nation in train and car accidents. Metro has it's own police force to issue citations to people who are unlucky enough to get hit by a train. It is always the fault of the driver, even when eye witness account's contradict Metro drivers. E) A vote was put to Houstonian's for the toy train to run down desolate West Park, it was approved. Now, Metro decides they don't want it down West park any more, they now want to run the toy train down much more congested Richmond Ave. Real estate down this ave. is much greater and businesses would be hurt by the snail's pace of construction and the sacrifice of lanes for this experiment. They refuse to allow Houstonians another vote of the matter for years now. F) Houston Metro has a history of snatching up real estate through eminate domain,(usualy real pieces of prime real estate) sitting on it for a while, then selling it to big corporation's or political cronies for big profit. G)The 10,000 sf building they were housed in didn't do much for them,so the Metro board decided a collosal $20 million dollar mansion was much more appropriate for the unaccountable board members of this city subsidized theives union. H) The toy train cannot operate in 3 inches of water. And recently (Oct. 2006), a rat chewed through some power cables and shut the whole system down for a day stranding thousands of Houstonians. Just brilliant.

I could go on, but I think I have made my point. When writing an article, especially for Wikipedia, balance should be the ideal. The above was written because the Metro article sounded like a sales add created by a marketing firm out of Nebraska. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.89.166.243 (talk • contribs) . By: Porkchop

While I disagree to a larger extent of what this person is saying, there are a few small points that need to be deleted to qualify it to have that darn tag removed. Otherwise, this a very good article.--Hourick 00:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing the page

[edit]

I have tried to fix the page. I added a lot more things. I looked at the DART page for suggestions, since they did it much better. The METRO page is now better than it was before. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by XxTrillvillexX9 (talk • contribs).

Rating

[edit]

I rate the new and improved METRO page (majority by me) an upgrade to A-Class! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by XxTrillvillexX9 (talk • contribs) 03:07, 26 October 2007

Metro bus fleet

[edit]

there is not any mention on the type of buses (regular/articulated/hybrid!) on this page. it would be nice to get a comprehensive assesment of this issue. IAH777 —Preceding comment was added at 11:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is it that you propose? Pictures of a variety of buses that are used? I can snap pictures of a good portion of them, but I'm not knowledgeable of the specs of the buses themselves.--Hourick 13:47, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

different pics would by nice as well. i personally like MBTA's bus page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBTA_Bus it doesn't have to be that detailed/set up as such if people feel its not warranted, but i am like you i am not knowlegeable on the buses but do think its imporatant to mention... IAH777 —Preceding comment was added at 12:38, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was bored and scoured the net and found this: [1] and added a photo that was already uploaded for a different article! Now just need to get previous models and specs. I will try to do something to add and get better photos of the various buses.

METRO Bus Photos

[edit]

Some more information on the METRO Bus would greatly be appreciated. Also, some bus shots wouldn't be too bad, either.

XxTrillvillexX9 21:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ridership Numbers

[edit]

Someone needs to seriously stop messing with the numbers. I am posting the right numbers from METRO's website, but someone keeps putting in 500,000.

XxTrillvillexX9 21:47, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

According to the parameter list and definitions at Template:Infobox Public transit, the ridership parameter is expressed as daily system ridership. I feel that adding annual ridership would be inconsistent with the intended infobox usage as well as the other public transit articles that use the infobox. Was the neutrality banner placed on the article because of this disagreement? Thanks, Postoak 04:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes the banner was placed on the article because of this disagreement. thank you for your input, and if this is agreed (Template:Infobox Public transit states that it is in daily ridership numbers) then it can be taken down.

IAH777 —Preceding comment was added at 15:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Messed Up

[edit]

Whoever re-edited the page has made it really unorganized. METRO's page was just getting started and it wasn't time for an unannounced split yet. I'm starting to put everything back. Once more and more news is tagged on, then a split should happen. Whoever edited it left it in a mess.

-- XxTrillvillexX9 (talk) 21:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Opening

[edit]

I changed the date the date of opening to 2004 and found a source to include the fact that Houston was the largest city in the U.S. without transit. Whoever mentioned Los Angeles before I edited the section must have been missing alot of brain cells, since this has nothing to do with the article.

Section removed

[edit]

This section was removed. I did not see how this trivia section improves the article in any way.

Metro in popular culture

  • In the movie Misson Impossable 3, Ethan Hawk (Tom Cruise) tells his wife that he has to go to Houston because METRO is haveing a "public transpo confrence" to cover for accepting a mission.
  • In the movie Rushmore, Max Fisher (Jason Schwartzman) is seen getting off a METRO bus.

Postoak (talk) 22:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is the topic?

[edit]

What is the topic of this article? Is this article about…

…the transit operator, the company?
…the Houston HOV system?
…the Houston bus system?
…the Houston METRORail system?
…expansion of METRORail?

I've bolded what I believe this article should address. This article should emulate WMATA. Doing so would substantially reduce the size of this article and would require much merging, splitting, and reorganization of this article and the METRORail article along with the creation of several new articles. --Millbrooky (talk) 00:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Initial rail proposal

[edit]

I found http://www.chron.com/CDA/archives/archive.mpl?id=1989_671749 "Metro likely to stay the credibility course/Upper-echelon row seen in positive light" - Houston Chronicle - December 17, 1989 - Bill Coutler, C, 1 WhisperToMe (talk) 19:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

300's - Shuttles and Limited Routes & 402 QL Bellaire

[edit]

I am planning to fix the description of route numbers, since it fails to list the shuttle and circulator routes: 313-326 and the 402 Quickline Bellaire. 257Townsen (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shredding lawsuit

[edit]

Metro seems to be getting itself in quite a bit of problems as of late, was wondering if the latest issue should eventually be included as it plays out. [2] --Hourick (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese name

[edit]

According to "德州簡訊." by the Epoch Times, the Chinese name of METRO is 休斯頓捷運 WhisperToMe (talk) 14:05, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy and Criticism section

[edit]

This section is getting to be a bit unwieldy, is there either a way to either condense it a bit more, get rid of some material that isn't that relevant, or perhaps should we just create a whole new page for that alone?--Hourick (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since there wasn't a response last time, I'd thought I'd give it another shot. My suggestion is this: Create a entire page devoted to the various controversies on different Metro Pages so we can trim down the various articles a bit more. --Hourick (talk) 16:41, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

WhisperToMe (talk) 21:44, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:METRO Light Rail3.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:METRO Light Rail3.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Rail Rolling Stock

[edit]

I tried to update the rolling stock (addition of last paragraph about H3 only) today based on the Metro press release but the rest of the section may need to be updated as it appears out of date. I don't have the relevant knowledge to provide accurate information outside of the H3 press release though so I didn't try to bring information up to date. Maybe someone with knowledge can assist?

Thebarnesology (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:38, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kashmere Transit Center

[edit]

Found a Harris County block book map of the Kashmere transit center:

WhisperToMe (talk) 15:57, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updated METRO Numbers

[edit]

I've noticed a lot of outdated information here. METRO's most recent 2017 METRO FACTS sheet was released recently and contains the most up to date information. How do I go about editing the listing? I'm new to this so any help and advice is appreciated. For disclosure pruposes, METRO is my employer. JackTrades1954 (talk) 17:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 September 2020

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to Houston Metro. (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 13:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County → Houston METRO – WP:COMMONNAME with natural disambiguation – Jadebenn (talk · contribs · subpages) 09:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 08:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

METRO Style

[edit]

METRO capitalizes its entire short-hand name rather than saying Metro. The article should use the same capitalization style of "METRO" to avoid public confusion and make it easier to identify the article as talking about the transit agency rather than the geographic region. Hero49states (talk) 15:15, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ridership data

[edit]

I noticed someone removed the annual ridership column from the route table. May someone explain why it was deleted so I can understand better? Ex696 (talk) 07:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Houston_Metro&oldid=1207651018"