Talk:House of the Temple

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Freemasonry Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freemasonry articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to join us in our labors, please join the discussion and add your name to the list of participants. The "Top of the Trestleboard" section below can offer some ideas on where to start and what to do.FreemasonryWikipedia:WikiProject FreemasonryTemplate:WikiProject FreemasonryFreemasonry articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

◆ WikiProject Freemasonry's "Top of the Trestleboard":

Improve to Featured Article status
Add content to stubs…
Check recently changed articles for possible improvement, to remove vandalism, etc.
Requests
[Watch this list]
- Articles for all United Grand Lodge of England-recognized Grand Lodges (if notable)
Participate in articles listed for deletion
Need images
New Article to be created

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranks Vs. Degrees

It would be more accurate to replace the term "ranks" with degrees. Any objections? Jgw (talk) 16:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No objections, because that is what they are. Whoever put in ranks was obviously not privy to the actual masonic philosophy and nomenclature to know freemasonry does not have "ranks" and such a use of the word insinuates a higherarchy in the degree system. While there is an elected leadership in all masonic bodies, true members know there is no membership in freemasonry higher than the first three craft degrees. The philosphical and moral instruction inherent within the organization which is presented in these forms, makes the attainment of knowledge better expressed by using the term "degree" than rank since it does not refer to a specific leadership role or responsibility but rather a completed level of moral and ethical instruction.

Burial Place?

This article mentions that Albert Pike is interred in the House of the Temple, yet the main article on Albert Pike mentions his burial place as the Oak Hill Cemetery. I do not know what is factual, perhaps someone who knows can make the correction. Merlin1935 (talk) 01:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

His remains were removed from Oak Hill Cemetery, and reinterred at the Temple. Pepe Oats (talk) 16:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Funding

Who paid for this building and how? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.173.31.167 (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please correct

The sentence

Confederate general and former Sovereign Grand Commander Albert Pike was the author of an 1871 book called Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, a book that describes in detail the 33 ranks of Freemasonry, the stories and teachings associated with each rank, the rituals connected to each rank, and other lodge proceedings.
contain errors. The book contains only the teachings (also called 'lectures' in Masonry) for the degrees, sort of philosophical comments to degrees, explanation of their meaning. It does not describe the stories, rituals and lodge proceedings at all.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on House of the Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on House of the Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced content

@Frumious Bander: Why are you removing sourced content from this article. If there's incorrect information in the paragraph then point it out here and we can fix it, rather than you removing the entire thing. APK whisper in my ear 20:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@APK: The reference to the Burns collection is redundant, since it is mentioned in the opening paragraph. The Pike information, I'm embarrassed to admit, is out of an abundance of caution at this particular moment because of the destruction of the Pike statue in D.C. in June. I can't justify removing the reference intellectually, but my concern is more practical and immediate. The building already attracts its share of anti-Masonic crazies and vandalism, but this year has been especially concerning in the wake of the statue incident. The House of the Temple officials are jittery over additional vandalism or worse, at least through the end of 2020. Removing the direct references to Pike's remains inside, at least temporarily, might partially shield it from the mob to a small extent. Your call. I won't fight you if you put it back. I frankly intended to restore it after December if the social unrest has finally calmed down. Frumious Bander (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Frumious Bander: The lead is supposed to summarize the article's content hence why Burns is mentioned twice. Regarding Pike, the statue incident was months ago and I highly doubt there's some type of plan to invade the temple. Besides, Wikipedia is not censored. APK whisper in my ear 20:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]