Talk:House Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the House Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from House Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 January 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 12:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
( )
... that before the House Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight artists could get their songs on the radio with payola? Source: Payola referred specifically to a practice that was nearly as old as the industry itself: manufacturing a popular hit by paying for radio play.- ALT1: ... that although the House Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight tried to end payola, it just became more sophisticated? Source: Insiders say the practice lives on — in a more sophisticated form... It changed over time so that it became much more sophisticated. At the end of the day, the labels still wanted hit records and the radio stations wanted cash.”
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hayes Theater
- Comment: 5x expanded
5x expanded by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 04:14, 19 January 2022 (UTC).
- Article was expanded 5× within a period of seven days from nomination. Gave it a heavy copy edit, correcting for tone and capitalization errors, chiefly wrt payola (not a proper noun). No close paraphrasing detected. ALT0 is contradicted by the article as the practice still persists. ALT1 is backed up by the source (I slightly tweaked the syntax), but the corresponding sentence in the article needs a <ref> after it. QPQ done. @Bruxton: DigitalIceAge (talk) 20:47, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- @DigitalIceAge: Thank you much for the review. I moved one ref to the hook in the article. Bruxton (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- My pleasure. Hook should be good to go now. DigitalIceAge (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class U.S. Congress articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Congress articles
- Unknown-subject U.S. Congress articles
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/December 2007
- Accepted AfC submissions