Talk:Hotel Polen fire/GA2
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer was a sockpuppet of a long-term abuser long before 24 December 2011, see: Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Mattisse#2012 and Talk:Hotel_Polen_fire/GA1. Targje (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Closing comment
[edit]So far as I know, there is no automatic justification for revoking GA status because a long-ago reviewer was a sockpuppet. If there are issues with the quality of the article, in particular, if it falls short of the GA criteria in any area, then they should have been listed here, so they could be addressed.
This reassessment has been open for over six months, and Targje, who opened, has not edited on Wikipedia since late March. Under the circumstances, I am closing the reassessment as "kept", since there is no criterion failure listed that would indicate that it should be delisted. Anyone is free, of course, to open a new reassessment if they find such issues with the article per the instructions at WP:GAR. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:57, 18 August 2016 (UTC)