Talk:Hot comb

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Hi, In your interesting article on "Hot comb" you refer to use of the comb by African Americans and people of African descent. I feel that this part of the article fails to reach the high standard of useful information you want to impart on this subject.

My contention is that if you want to describe the people who use this hairdressing technique, then, certain facts may incline you to adjust your article so that it will not have this one major inaccuracy in it. The first of these facts is that according to modern anthropology, the first humans are believed to have emerged in Africa and increased in a dispersal from Africa. That is to say the root of all humanity is in Africa. Hence to say that someone is of African descent in this context is merely to say they are one of the many and various types of human being alive today, not all of whom engage in a frequent use of the hot comb.

Secondarily, of course it might be reasonable to say all people of African descent from after a particular date in history or prehistory. This will present you with the difficulty of the inclusion of the descendants of South Africans, Ugandans, Zimbabweans and other Africans. whose immediate forbears were from the Indian subcontinent and from Europe. These people are and were citizens of African countries. Therefore they are Africans. But they won't be users of the Hot comb A third point where I feel your article may not be saying exactly what you want it to say is when you make seperate reference to both African Americans and to people of African descent. The former of these groups is a subset of the latter but you have not include other subsets such as the Afro-Caribean community in Britain etc.

you are joking? right? i just won't believe *anybody* could be as clueless as to get on his anti-racism high horse just because someone off-handedly refers to black people as 'africans/afro-americans'

Feb 12, 2010 - I wonder about the links at the bottom of the page. They seem more like advertising than they are adding to the information of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.153.194 (talk) 14:10, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made some small changes to make this page adhere more towards standard Wikipedia style (set up references, small spelling corrections, etc) and added categories (I'm sure there are more and better ones). This page needs a major overhaul - it reads like a high school essay. I removed this quote because I could not find the work referenced: “In America shortly after the end of slavery, long straight hair was a sign of privilege and, therefore, a sign of respect and beauty.” (Lommel 56)Curtangel (talk) 21:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey guys this page is vandalized and used for advertisemente!!!!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hot comb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]