Talk:Hot Potato (video game)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a or will be replaced with a . Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.
Criteria
[edit]For further detail, see WP:WIAGA
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Issues found
[edit]- The New York Times reference needs to use {{Cite web}}
- File:Hot Potato Screenshot.jpg has no information on who the copyright belongs to. I typically put it in the other_information parameter of the fair use rationale
- I added the copyright information and changed some of the other information around as well to make it more clear. Nomader (Talk) 16:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Metacritic reference gives a 404 error. Please see here and here for how to recover the correct link. The publisher parameter also lists it as MetaCritic instead of Metacritic (lower case c)
- Bad news– the link doesn't seem to come up on either archive.org or through the apps.metacritic.com. If I do a search using the apps website though, it shows the Metacritic score the game received ([1]). Am I able to use that as a citation instead? Nomader (Talk) 16:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- That's fine, just be sure to archive it using Webcite. Everything else looks good. --Teancum (talk) 18:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I archived it and put the link in the article, should take care of the last issue. Nomader (Talk) 19:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- (Lead section) "The game makes the player..." flows strangely. How about "In the game the player must..."
- (Gameplay section) The references at the end of the first paragraph should be reversed so that they're in numeric order
- (Gameplay section) The word 7 should be spelled out seven
- (Gameplay section) In the third sentence of the second paragraph, "from the road" is unnecessary and confusing - it makes the sentence to long to clearly understand
- (Gameplay section) "The game has no multiplayer component." is unnecessary as the reader is informed of that through the infobox
- (Reception section) "He criticized the game for failing to introduce the player to the point of the game" - two uses of "the game" seems redundant and unclear here. It should work just fine with "He criticized it for failing..."
Review complete - Gotta love the short articles. I'm done here, so please reply when these issues have been addressed.
- Thanks for the review! Well I think I've responded to all of your comments save the Metacritic issue. If worst comes to worst I can just remove Metacritic from the article altogether for now and just go with Game Rankings. Nomader (Talk) 16:32, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Good work. The article can now PASS. --Teancum (talk) 20:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Teancum! Nomader (Talk) 03:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 12:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)