Talk:Hot Coffee (minigame)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 03:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Preamble from Vami

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. My name is Vami, and I will be your reviewer. During this review I may make small edits such as spelling corrections, but I will only suggest substantive content changes in comments here. For responding to my comments, please use

Done,

Fixed,

Added,

Not done,

Doing..., or

Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. As my comments are addressed or rebutted, I will cross them out, and only my comments.

If I have demonstrated incompetence or caused offense, please let me know. –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 03:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[...] "include new functionality and interaction in line with the 'vibe' of the game" [...] Appears there's a missing or errant apostrophe in here.
[...] and he collaborated with a modder in the United States to create the mod. First mention of any specific mod.
The lead should probably talk about how RockStar lied about creating Hot Coffee rather than just leaving it at their initial and short lived silence.

GA progress

Images are relevant and free/tagged. –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 03:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright violations. Note to future reviewers, if you run Earwig's, the similarity likelihood is as high as it is because of the amount of direct quotations used in the article. –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 03:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Customary ping @GhostRiver, as the review has been sitting around for close to a month. IceWelder [✉] 21:50, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vami IV: Since GhostRiver seems to not be reponding, I would like to finish up the article to not let your now one-month-old review go to waste. I have made some copyedits to article, including changes I believe should address your latter two points. However, I'm not sure what you would like to have improved in the first one; the quote seems fine to me, with "vibe" surrounded by apostrophes as a quote-in-a-quote. IceWelder [✉] 19:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@IceWelder: I commend you for your intervention. I will pass the article now. –♠Vamí _IV†♠ 02:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.