Talk:Hospital-acquired condition

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hospitals Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Never Events

I am thinking this article should also include something on Never Events, and the new (2009) modifiers PA PB and BC.

JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That may be, sure. I wrote the article from the POV of someone who wrote a MS-DRG grouper. The bits which don't come into play with the grouper, I didn't bother with, but you're welcome to add. - Denimadept (talk) 15:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Globalize?

This is a US-specific topic. How can you globalize it? - Denimadept (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any patient, in any hospital, has a potential risk for developing hospital acquired conditions. Little pob (talk) 22:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's why, not how. - Denimadept (talk) 11:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ultimately ~~such~~ an article on Hospital-acquired conditions could cover HAIs, post-op complications, etc - although that may result in a disambiguation page. The current article content could be preserved by moving it to Hospital-acquired condition (MS-DRG category). As the Diagnosis-related group in question is only used in the US, there would then be no need to globalise. Whilst more precise, it's difficult to tell if this approach would comply with primary topic given the article's stability. Little pob (talk) 13:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hospital-acquired condition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]