Talk:Hospice and palliative medicine

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cmacaulay970, CalciferoI.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 24 November 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kennedybreak.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Hospice Nursing re-directs to Palliative Care! Argh. Someone should do something about this. Like that guy in the mirror. Rdewald (talk) 14:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do we need a larger disambiguation page? I am not sure how to make that. But I could look it up.

As someone in the fields I see a distinction (with overlap) among:

Hospice
Palliative Care
Hospice and Palliative Medicine

Ctsinclair (talk) 06:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

Can anybody identify why there is any value in having this as a separate article, rather than just redirecting to Palliative Care ?

From a global perspective, that article already covers both palliative care, including hospice care, with the note that in the U.S. a divide is drawn between the two, but this is not the case in most of the world where hospice care is treated as one particular aspect of palliative care.

So long as the Palliative Care continues to encompass both, there is surely no need for this as a separate umbrella article. Jheald (talk) 11:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the idea of merger. This is an article about a physician subspecialty in the United States, e.g., nephrology, rheumatology, medical toxicology or pain management. Please see the sources for this article for support. There were times when writers in other articles had sought to internally link to a Wikipedia article for this subspecialty "Hospice and Palliative Medicine," and until this article was written they had had to cobble together a bifurcated set of links, "hospice and palliative care," which did not actually serve that purpose. This article could be expanded to include some of the relevant types of information included in some of the other subspecialty articles. However, expansion is a separate matter from merger.

On the other hand, palliative care encompasses all disciplines involved in improving the quality of life of patients with life-limiting/life-threatening disease or injury, e.g., nursing, social work, chaplaincy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, etc., as well as physicians, who act as inter-disciplinary team leaders, medical directors, and top-level clinicians.

brimcmike (talk) 03:54, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As a palliative care physician, I agree with brimcmike. We could include the growth of the subspecialty in other parts of the world for example the UK. If other medical specialties have different pages why shouldn't an officially recognize ABMS specialty? Ctsinclair (talk) 06:23, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see this article fleshed out more so it looks more like internal medicine or family medicine Ctsinclair (talk) 06:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the Certification of specialist portion of this article, it might be beneficial to include the steps prior to becoming certified for entirety of the process (i.e. Medical School, Residency, Fellowship). Also, the American Board of Internal Medicine and American Osteopathic Association could have could have links. However this is an informative section for this article. Jymiegra (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I think the information regarding the prior steps is included in the preceding subsection.HNoorul12 (talk) 17:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hospice and palliative medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101116144358/http://abms.org/News_and_Events/downloads/NewSubcertPalliativeMed.pdf to http://www.abms.org/News_and_Events/downloads/NewSubcertPalliativeMed.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. The section "Education and training of hospice and palliative care physicians" seems very informative. I would suggest trying to incorporate more wikipedia articles where you can, ex. " here are 156 recognized fellowship programs in Hospice and Palliative Medicine". Perhaps there is a link to the fellowship programs that already exist? Good luck! ˜˜˜˜Kifeagwu (talk) 11:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

The section "Role of hospice and palliative care physicians" is concise and informative - may benefit from a bullet point style of presentation for the list of expertise of these physicians. I'd also be curious as to what are all the different roles in an interdisciplinary hospice or palliative care team. Cheers! Aileengozali (talk) 15:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology & Intro Section

The etymology section looks great! I love the historical info about the development of the specialty. Just a few thoughts: - It may be useful to include hyperlinks to other wikipedia pages or external sites, especially for national organizations or well-known people. - In the sentence describing the Latin etymology of "palliate," I would advise moving the "to palliate is to..." phrase into a new sentence. - Some references, including [1] and [2] appear after a space after the end of the sentence, but they should be immediately adjacent to the end of the sentence. - Is it possible to link to a webpage for the "Approaching Death" report? Even if the report itself isn't available, it may be better to use a formal reference instead of putting the authors in parentheses - It might also help to split the section up into a couple paragraphs separating the etymology from the more recent history of the specialty

Intro section is also great! Ayush.midha (talk) 18:55, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]