Talk:Horten H.III
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Horten H.III article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge?
[edit]A single article for all the H.III variants would be better, to elevate it from the dreaded Stub Class.Petebutt (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
- I have to agree, especially since there's already a one-sentence stub for the Horten Ho III. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 15:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- B-Class Smithsonian Institution-related articles
- Low-importance Smithsonian Institution-related articles
- WikiProject Smithsonian Institution-related articles
- B-Class Germany articles
- Low-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- Start-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- Start-Class gliding articles
- WikiProject Gliding articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles