This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Horrie the Wog Dog is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Jim Moody's x-wives (1935-1947), (1951-1957)and (1963-1968) did not confirm the story, nor did other close relatives of Moody's.
Wtf is this bullshit??! Doesn't anyone read Australian articles? Why do I have to be the only one to wade thru this crap?
On top of this, there is only a brief mention of Horrie's achievements prior to his homecoming. Recent Sydney Morning Herald Good Weekend article goes into a lot of very interesting detail about this. Horrie could sense an enemy plane attack minutes before any human could hear anything, giving the troops extra time to take cover. This happened numerous times. Those who were there praised Horrie's bravery as he snarled and barked at the strafing plances, and they believe that he saved Australian lives.
It's Remembrance Day. Isn't there a single soldier, serving or ex, who could do something about this wretched mess?
Australian material in Wikipedia is a truly shameful shambles. There appears to be no interest in this country for the writing of good pages on Australian themes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myles325a (talk • contribs) 09:21, 11 November 2013
G'day, I have had a go at tidying up the article a bit. A lot of what was there appeared to be original research, so I have removed it as per the guidelines. Additionally, some of it seemed a bit tangental to the topic. Happy to discuss my changes further if anyone disagrees with the amount of content removed. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]