Talk:Horrible Science
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Incomplete book list by about 4 books... Wikisquared 16:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Evil Inventions
[edit]I believe that this page has no where near enough relevance to e a Wikopedia page all on its own. It should either be joined with the Horrible Science phage or there should be another page called "List of Horrible Science Books", briefly detailing each one. --Coin945 (talk) 06:49, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Blood ,bones and body bits.JPG
[edit]Image:Blood ,bones and body bits.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Great books
[edit]These books are probably the main reason I got into science. I recommend them. Communisthamster (talk) 20:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
proposal of creating article for the TV series.
[edit]Can I propose creating an article for the CITV series. Horrible Histories has one or two articles for its CBBC series, after all. Visokor (talk) 16:23, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
The TV series article is already redlinked in the
template. Just go ahead and create it!! :D--Coin945 (talk) 02:47, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Horrible Science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714181241/http://www.nickarnold-website.com/teacher/Teaching%20Science%20the%20Horrible%20Way.pdf to http://www.nickarnold-website.com/teacher/Teaching%20Science%20the%20Horrible%20Way.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714181151/http://nickarnold-website.com/experiments/Horrible_hydrogen.pdf to http://nickarnold-website.com/experiments/Horrible_hydrogen.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150323035133/http://horrible-science.co.uk/reviews to http://www.horrible-science.co.uk/reviews
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100416150011/http://www.ise5-14.org.uk/prim3/New_Guidelines/Newsletters/33/Horrible_Science.htm to http://www.ise5-14.org.uk/prim3/New_Guidelines/Newsletters/33/Horrible_Science.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150323035133/http://horrible-science.co.uk/reviews to http://www.horrible-science.co.uk/reviews
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714181210/http://nickarnold-website.com/hs_teacher.htm to http://nickarnold-website.com/hs_teacher.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Dates of Books
[edit]Many of the books state they were released in 2018, when this is obviously not the case. Is this an example of vandalism or potential book reissues? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:640:C401:2CF8:988A:F225:8A64:6528 (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Agreed, I know for a fact I owned some of the earliest books easily 20 years ago!! 80.42.130.166 (talk) 15:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)