Talk:Horns (film)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 11 December 2012 by reviewer Alexrexpvt (talk · contribs).

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance).

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

United States: Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Notes: I am unsure if this is the proper location to be placing the following. If not please feel free to either delete it or move it to where it should be posted or just tell me and I will attempt to move it where it should be posted. Thank you.

I believe the article about this movie is a bit misleading. The movie is not just about a murder or the changes the main character goes through. It is also about the seven deadly sins. The disjointed way in which the film is shot and presented makes it hard to follow the story but you meet up with each of the different types of sins such as gluttony (the woman who ate the donuts), greed, vanity, avarice, and so forth. There are also misleading statements made about the film. The sentence where Ig goes to the bar is incorrect. The reporters/press followed him to the bar. He did not goad them in to doing anything. Ig stated simply said "Why don't you fight each other and whoever is the winner I'll give an exclusive interview to". This isn't goading anyone into anything. It is the reporter's greed for that exclusive interview that makes them fight each other and is what makes the female reporter say to Ig "Are we worthy yet?". So both adulation and greed for the interview prevail. Ig also doesn't "make" the bartender burn down his bar. Ig actually says the exact opposite to the bartender. Ig tells him not to burn down the bar but the bartender insists that it is a good idea and does it anyway. However, no one ever comes out of the burning bar. So it can, therefore, be presumed that everyone in the bar perished which is weird since the bartender's idea was to burn it down to collect the insurance money. The horns bring out the worst in everyone. Usually in a sexual way (doctor and nurse, naked man in bar, etc...) which means we are dealing with the most primal instincts. I also feel that the film was attempting to put Satan in a different light and that the transformation into a demon didn't actually affect Ig or how Ig felt or acted but simply showed that outwards appearances have nothing to do with the inner person. Which would mean that Satan is only considered to be evil because that is what we have been taught to believe but - if Satan is like Ig - It could simply be because no one is willing to give Satan the chance to be good. He is evil simply because he is evil and no matter how much logic is applied nor evidence to the contrary applied - he is just evil. Because that is what everyone wants him to be. Sort of a scape goat for all of our ills.66.196.239.162 (talk) 21:34, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He drives a AMC Gremlin.

What? NO mention of that? A hipster driving one of those is ultimate black comedy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:4101:4167:40AE:1F73:64E6:AD1 (talk) 19:39, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]