Talk:Hormizd III/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 17:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a couple of minor copy edits.
Daryaee is not used as a source. Should he be under 'See also'?
"who is called unfair". I have no idea what this means. Would it be possible to rephrase?
"this is most likely a legend, and is disproved by other sources" If it is "disproved" then it is definitely a legend. You need to reword here. (Maybe "disproved" -> 'contradicted'?)

Changed unfair -> unjust. I've also added Daryaee as a source and changed disproved -> contradicted. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That all looks good to me. A fine little article. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:54, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed