Talk:Horagalles

Pajonn was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 December 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Horagalles. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arctic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hercules/Heracles

The name part addition to Thor makes it out to be and is very similar and close to the Greek strongman son of the high God (much as Thor is son of the high god Odin) Zeus named Heracles, or Hercules when the Roman counterpart son of Jove/Jupiter. This should be noted and if anywhere attested to in books or works should be sourced so as not to be original research on my part, but the similarity is so close I do not see how every author on the subject could have omitted that observation. 4.242.174.52 (talk) 13:03, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also called "Mad".

Rewritten

I have almost completely rewritten the article, adding several 20th-century references to demonstrate the now unanimous scholarly view that the name Horagalles derives from Norse Þórr-karl or its derivative in either Swedish or Norwegian. The view of, for example, Friis that it was impossible to determine which borrowed from which is now superseded. And the varying translations "old man Thor," "Thor the man," "Thor fellow," etc. are all referring to the same term, which can be translated into English in several different ways, so I have equated them accordingly. I've also added as further reading 2 articles by Axel Olrik that appear to have been the first in-depth examinations of the material from the point of view of information on Germanic paganism, but that also presumably sum up the Sami material well; in particular, we don't cover here the thunder-god's servant, and that should be added, together with any more on Ravdna that is available. But I may have reached the limits of Google Books.

I am also going to modify our article on Tiermes. There is general agreement that he is the same god, so I am not entirely sure we should have two articles, but my understanding is that from an overall Sami point of view Tiermes is the better name to use, whereas Horagalles is the name by which he is known in the scholarship on Norse-Finnic influence and specifically on Thor. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge. NukeofEarl (talk) 19:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that Tiermes be merged into this article. Both articles, and those sources that mention both, agree that they are names for the same deity. This article contains more information on the god, as well as having the section on the connection with Thor. There is very little information at Tiermes that is not also here. Also my impression is that there is currently more scholarly discussion under the name Horagalles than Tiermes. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:26, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This sounds perfectly logical to me. :bloodofox: (talk) 20:59, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.