Talk:Hoosier National Forest

A fact from Hoosier National Forest appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 307 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the state of Indiana in 1972 set aside 6,000 acres (2,400 ha) of Hoosier National Forest just for the purpose of reintroducing wild turkey to the Hoosier state?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/June.

Wikipedia

United States: Indiana Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

Late seventeenth-century European villages in central Indiana, we're being told here? Did voyageurs even pass through the state? Why does the DYK hook say that this forest tract was set aside just for the purpose of reintroducing wild turkey to the Hoosier state? --Wetman (talk) 00:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It said a portion of the forest was dedicated for it; not the whole forest (that would be a LOT of turkey). French traders set up Vincennes, Indiana, so such villages existing is not far fetched.--Bedford ^Pray 01:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled: if "The oldest town in Indiana, Vincennes was originally established in 1732", as Wikipedia states in that article, seventeenth-century towns in Indiana, even "late seventeenth-century" ones, must be beyond far-fatched. --Wetman (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary trading camps, or a few small enclaves, could exist and still mean Vincennes was the first town. Also, nothing says those settlements lasted any length of time.--Bedford ^Pray 04:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...or someone thinks 1700s is "seventeenth century". --Wetman (talk) 05:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoosier National Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6ENvCUJPk?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foresthistory.org%2FASPNET%2FPlaces%2FNational%2520Forests%2520of%2520the%2520U.S.pdf to http://www.foresthistory.org/ASPNET/Places/National%20Forests%20of%20the%20U.S.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]