Talk:Hoodoo Mountain/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start this soon. ♦ jaguar 15:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the article and am content in giving it an outright pass. It is well written and constructed so that even a non-volcanologist like me can read through it comfortably. The lead summarises the article, the citations are all in check and there are no grammatical errors to boot. I have made a couple of minor amendments with spelling and also unlinked saucer in the Geological studies subsection - I assume there's a proper term for this but couldn't find an article. This article clearly meets the GA criteria and will likely do well at FAC. Good work with this one! ♦ jaguar 19:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: Thanks. I don't think saucer had to be unlinked because there doesn't seem to be a landform definition for that word. Hoodoo's summit being compared to an inverted and very shallow saucer is like comparing a shield volcano to a warrior's shield, which is what they are named after. Volcanoguy 23:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]