Talk:Honky Tonk Women

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

I created Country Honk because much of the information on here (e.g. all of the info box) refers to the song Honky Tonk Women and not Country Honk. I have therefor rewritten HTW to reference out to Country Honk where relevent. I don't think the articles should merge - different lyrics, different personnel, different release formats, different titles..... twitter 15:34, 16 August 2006 (UTC) hmmm. it is it's own song, but merging it would keep things simple seeing as it is a version of honky tonk women. yeah merge it. just give it it's own section after the main piece for honky tonk women. Stan weller 17:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I foolishly performed the merge before checking this talk page; I apologize for my haste, and I have undone the merge. However, I still feel that combining the articles is justified. Country Honk is a great song, but WP: notability (songs) provides little support for variant album tracks of notable songs. Jlittlet 22:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK I am happy to go along with the majority view here. I would say however that I suspect that most variant album tracks are either extended versions of the same song or accoustic versions of an 'electric' track. I am struggling to think of another 'pair' of songs which are as different as Country Honk and Honky Tonk Women. However feel free to merge as you see fit. twitter 10:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC) — WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SINGLE VERSION & THE LP VERSION & WAS HONKY TONK WOMAN EVER RELEASED IN STEREO?[reply]

honky tonk women

j'ai 45t de "honky tonk women" des rolling stones, je n'arrive pas o trouver sa côte

I don't know what you're talking about. I want you to type in English. LSM1204 (talk) 17:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Country Honk/ HTW Timeline

There seems to be some confusion in this article about which version was recorded first. The first mention of "Country Honk" states assertively that this was the first version of the song recorded. Later in the article, however, it says that there is some dispute about this between sources. Can anyone determine the true timeline? Otherwise, could the earlier passage be made less black and white, explaining the uncertainty which was the original? Snyrt

I think that "country honk" is recorded before "honky tonk women". LSM1204 (talk) 17:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amp Section

There is a lot of discussion about the amps used. Is this really important to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.130.169.101 (talk) 07:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. It is also fraught with mistakes. The Stones used Ampeg amps onstage at Hyde Park in July 1969 and the fall US tour. Vytal (talk) 19:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funny that you mention mistakes, as you just made one yourself. The stones used Hiwatt amps at Hyde Park. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.84.254 (talk) 13:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

quote added

I added Keith Richards quote about Mick Taylor's contribution. It would seem to me an important point b/c the guy is only 20 yrs. old in his 1st month with the band and Richards (who isn't real quick to give credit to others, you can see that w/ what he did w/ Gram Parsons) points out that Taylor changed the song some. Also, I didn't have the original magazine, Crawdaddy, and when I looked for it online, I found the website, but no way to get to the issue from 1975. Appleford in his book mentions that Richards was interviewed by this magazine, but his book does not contain endnotes. However, Appleford is a very good, well-researched source. V Schauf (talk) 03:46, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason to delete the Richards quote that I have now put back in. It gives additional information about the song and Mick Taylor's contribution to it. It should stay; it's REFERENCED! V Schauf (talk) 17:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

so is the Mick Taylor quote that says something quite different, but ... peace, okay? don't shout Sssoul (talk) 19:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, sorry for shouting, but the fact that we are now showing 2 different viewpoints between Richards and Taylor makes the article more informative, interesting and nuanced. V Schauf (talk) 16:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

on second thought, i've just moved both quotes to the section on Honky Tonk Women, since that's the track they're actually about - i hope that makes sense. the Taylor quote was already mentioned in that section anyway, albeit with a different source mentioned. Sssoul (talk) 16:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LetitbleedRS.jpg

The image Image:LetitbleedRS.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cover me

I've also heard a cover on a CD Stone Country (which I don't have a copy of...). Can somebody substatiate & include? TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 06:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eliminating the "pop culture" section

in accordance with the proposal here. Sssoul (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't elimanate the pop culture sections entirely as some of them contain information that's relevant to the article. If something bothers you, discuss it in the talk page. --66.253.145.149 (talk) 07:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cover version

I think this is Aretha Franklin covering it, but I'm not sure. See at about 3:20 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2CuUacQeKE&feature=related Anyway we should ID this version and include it. -Chumchum7 (talk) 14:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its Tina Turner. -Chumchum7 (talk) 18:41, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Honky Tonk Women. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too many assumptions in the presentation of what a honky tonk woman is

It is wrong that the presentation is an assumption that the woman was a prostitute. She could have been a bar patron, just like the male patron who is the protagonist in the song. Or she could have been a B-girl: Bargirl#"B-girl_activity"_in_the_US --since the barroom queen was in Memphis -presumably, Tennessee, not in ancient Egypt. A change needs to be made in the interpretation of the song.Dogru144 (talk) 02:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. Has been CN for 5 years. I will remove. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]