Talk:Hong Kong Morris

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

WikiProject Dance To-do list:

To nominate at WP:FAC:
To improve to Featured standard:
To nominate as a Good article:
To expand: 18th century dance - 20th century ballet - Bolero - Choreography on Broadway - Dance education - English ballet - Indian classical dance - Italian ballet - List of dance companies - Meg Stuart - Opera ballet - Sasha Waltz - Scotch reel - Set dance - Physically integrated dance
To cleanup: Contra dance - Salsa (dance) - Dandiya - Lead and follow
To unbias:
To check for copyvios:
To merge: List of dancers and List of dance personalities‎ as per AfD discussion
Substubs needing expansion: see /substubs
To destub: Amir Hossain Babu - Canada Dance Festival - Dance etiquette - Flash dance - more
Needing references: Chorus line - specifically verifying that each girl actually started out as a chorine
To create: Broadway dance - Country Western Dance International - Dance and cinema - Dance and society - German folk dancing - Latin swing - Post-structuralist ballet - Push (dance) - Salon dance - Shuffle dance - Swing boogie - World Dance Alliance - Xavier Le Roy - more
Wanted Pics/Graphics: Category:Dance articles needing images

Hong Kong

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (18)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (295)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,054)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,475) • Stub-Class articles (6,683)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

Probably shameless self-promotion, and worth deletion, but may have some sort of cultural significance. I strongly doubt there will be any way to verify its notability, veracity or context, though.

All written by one user, who clearly has an invested interest and edits in an unencyclopedic tone. And what is with all the names in bold?

"Dave Wilmshurst, now academic editor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong and a man who rarely misses the opportunity to air his opinions on the Sino-French War, also a"

Qué?! -Kez (talk) 02:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Justification for removal of flags

I disagree. The article reads exactly like an encyclopedia, and I can find little evidence in this version of "shameless self-promotion". As you suggest it seems to have quite notable cultural significance. I have, therefore, removed the story flag and the COI flag.

As for the question of original research, whilst I have to agree with you on that it reads as if there is, I do not believe that it is necessary to flag the article as such: if there is no COI (established above), I do not see that there is a problem (established). Articles of this sort are bound to contain original research.

-Tomopope (talk) 23:50, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot, however, simply decide on your own that the flags are unneccessary.

A lot of the the name-dropping and non-notable (irrelevent) discussion of members' personalities has been removed.

However, tone is still unencyclopedic and self-promoting (for example - sections discussing the project's multiculturalism, when that is adequate in a sentence, and, similarly, positive weasel words inserted throughout the article and apparent in the non-standard bolding of 'multiculturalism' and 'inclusivity' in the introduction.

Most importantly, the article has all been written by one, involved, user. And the article cites no in-line references.

These need to be addressed, however, I am simply not interested enough in the subject to enforce the changes. This needs a third party involved. -Kez (talk) 16:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion: I'm with Kez on this; the tags most definitely need to stay on the page until the issues are resolved. And this article certainly has its issues... — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 19:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article currently has one in-line reference, and I intend to add more shortly. The Hong Kong Morris will be holding its AGM on Saturday 17 January and I hope to be able to come away from the meeting with the minutes of previous years' AGMs, which will enable me to add several more notable events in the side's history to the article, and also provide precise dates and citations for most events mentioned in the article. Many of the side's members have kept clippings from the South China Morning Post and Hong Kong Standard newspapers on Hong Kong Morris events, and these will also enable accurate citations to be given.

I have unbolded the words multiculturalism and inclusivity in the introduction.

Djwilms (talk) 00:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]